According to liability laws, who is not held liable for TCOLE's statistics on race and ethnicity?

The reasoning behind the selection of the individual officer as not being held liable for TCOLE's statistics on race and ethnicity pertains to the framework of accountability within which these statistics are generated and reported. Liability laws typically assign responsibility to the larger entities such as departments and governing bodies, rather than individuals acting within their official capacities.

In this context, TCOLE, or the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement, relies on data collected from law enforcement agencies statewide. The statistical representation of race and ethnicity is a reflection of systemic practices and policies set forth by police departments rather than the conduct of individual officers in isolation. Since these statistics are a compilation of agency data that reflects broader trends in enforcement practices, the individual officer is not directly responsible for the aggregated data.

Conversely, the department itself is tasked with oversight and reporting requirements, and governing bodies may be held accountable for policy-making that influences these statistics. Victims involved in incidents reported in these statistics cannot be held liable either, as they are not participants in the collection or reporting of the data. Thus, the focus on institutional accountability rather than individual actions supports why the individual officer is not deemed liable in this specific context.