True or False: A peace officer may pursue and arrest without a warrant if there is satisfactory proof that a felony has been committed and the offender is about to escape.

A peace officer has the authority to pursue and arrest without a warrant when there is satisfactory proof that a felony has occurred and the offender is on the verge of escaping. This provision is grounded in the need for law enforcement to act swiftly in situations where delaying action to obtain a warrant could lead to the suspect fleeing and potentially evading justice. The emphasis on "satisfactory proof" relates to the need for a clear and immediate understanding of the situation, ensuring that officers can act confidently when faced with such circumstances.

This rule is also significant in maintaining public safety, allowing officers to prevent further harm or criminal activity by an individual who has committed a serious offense. The ability to make an arrest without a warrant in these cases underscores the balance between the urgency of preventing crime and the rights of individuals, which the legal framework carefully manages. Other options such as limitations based on the nature of the crime or time of day do not apply in this context.