What is the standard of proof required for a criminal conviction in Texas?

The standard of proof required for a criminal conviction in Texas is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This standard demands a high level of certainty from the jury or judge regarding the defendant's guilt before a conviction can be secured. It ensures that if there is any reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt, the jury must acquit the defendant. This standard protects the accused by requiring that the prosecution must establish its case to such an extent that there are no reasonable alternatives or explanations that could lead a juror to doubt the guilt of the defendant.

The other standards of proof mentioned are used in different contexts. "Preponderance of the evidence" is the standard typically used in civil cases, where the evidence must show that something is more likely true than not. "Clear and convincing evidence" is a higher standard than preponderance but lower than beyond a reasonable doubt, typically used in certain civil cases or issues like involuntary commitment. "Probable cause" is used for certain legal processes like searches and arrests, indicating that there is a reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed, but it is not sufficient for a conviction in a criminal trial. Understanding these distinctions helps clarify the rigorous standard required for a criminal conviction in Texas.